<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of SpamArrest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/email-spam/review-of-spamarrest/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/email-spam/review-of-spamarrest</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Hilley</title>
		<link>http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/email-spam/review-of-spamarrest#comment-69339</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Hilley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/review-of-spamarrest#comment-69339</guid>
		<description>I use Spam Arrest on a Mac and the interface is very slow in firefox, safari and chrome ... it is basically useless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Spam Arrest on a Mac and the interface is very slow in firefox, safari and chrome &#8230; it is basically useless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechSupport</title>
		<link>http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/email-spam/review-of-spamarrest#comment-25939</link>
		<dc:creator>TechSupport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/review-of-spamarrest#comment-25939</guid>
		<description>Well I can't say that I have had to use their support yet.  I would agree that if the support is what you say it is then that would not be acceptable to me.  I use the web interface with IE7 and do not notice any real slowness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can&#8217;t say that I have had to use their support yet.  I would agree that if the support is what you say it is then that would not be acceptable to me.  I use the web interface with IE7 and do not notice any real slowness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big_Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/email-spam/review-of-spamarrest#comment-25406</link>
		<dc:creator>Big_Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrcomputerllc.com/askme/review-of-spamarrest#comment-25406</guid>
		<description>To bad Spamarrest has such crappy support. We've been using it here for over a year, over that time we've had no e-mail for an entire day at least 6 times. not a big deal for personal messages but we are a business, each  time we don't get an e-mail is business lost. Their service is spotty, when you call for support you typically get a machine, and no call back, or you get a call the next day after the problem has been resolved. Lame. When the service is up using the web interface is  painfully slow to the point of being almost useless. You still get spam in your "unverified" folder as well as any e-mails sent from people who do not reply to the 'Challenge e-mail" which occurs quite often, so you still end up sifting through page after page of spam trying to find that message.

I am so unhappy with Spamarrest because of these reasons, I have worked with them  trying to let them know their faults so they can repair them but all I get it "it works fine on this end" (regarding the slow interface) I guess slow is good...
Whatever, don't believe the hype if you are looking for a Web-based e-mail solution for a business do not use Spamarrest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad Spamarrest has such crappy support. We&#8217;ve been using it here for over a year, over that time we&#8217;ve had no e-mail for an entire day at least 6 times. not a big deal for personal messages but we are a business, each  time we don&#8217;t get an e-mail is business lost. Their service is spotty, when you call for support you typically get a machine, and no call back, or you get a call the next day after the problem has been resolved. Lame. When the service is up using the web interface is  painfully slow to the point of being almost useless. You still get spam in your &#8220;unverified&#8221; folder as well as any e-mails sent from people who do not reply to the &#8216;Challenge e-mail&#8221; which occurs quite often, so you still end up sifting through page after page of spam trying to find that message.</p>
<p>I am so unhappy with Spamarrest because of these reasons, I have worked with them  trying to let them know their faults so they can repair them but all I get it &#8220;it works fine on this end&#8221; (regarding the slow interface) I guess slow is good&#8230;<br />
Whatever, don&#8217;t believe the hype if you are looking for a Web-based e-mail solution for a business do not use Spamarrest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
